The Storytelling Incident

This was supposed to be a post about internet comments, but that one got out of hand. A lot of my writing is like that. Check back later to find out about Levinas, the use of knowledge of as club to stop conversation.

I have a child. I have three children, but for the purpose of this story, I have a male child whose defining characteristics are: brilliant, small, emotionally reactive, and not entire socially ept. From early in elementary school he has been flagged as, “most likely to be bullied” by one teacher, principal, and school system after another.

When I say brilliant, I don’t mean, “tests well”. He doesn’t, not particularly.

I mean that he is intrinsically and breathtakingly intelligent. When he was two years old, another parent who watched him for a few minutes while I dashed to the bathroom said to me, “Does he always talk like that?” “Like?” I asked. “Like… ” Another parent in the group chimed in, “Like an adult?” When he was four and we were going through the Finding Nemo phase, he engaged a professor of biology in an extended discussion about how to identify various fish based on their dorsal fins. He was the one who started the conversation. He engages with the world deeply, and profoundly, and then tries to tell everybody around him about it. At length. Glazed-over eyes no object. To put it in no uncertain terms… he’s weird.

When I say that my child is weird, please don’t hear this as a negative judgment. It is not, “I love him but…” I love him. He is a spectacularly interesting human being who pushes me to learn things that I’ve never considered. I feel blessed every day that I got to meet him and that he is in my life. So when I say that he is weird, I mean only this: he is so far off the end of the normal curve that it is absurd to act like we don’t notice.

All this is by way of introducing the strategy that we have been encouraged to pursue in taking him off the “most likely to be bullied” list. (I’ll get back to why that is an unacceptable goal in a while.) His teachers (for the most part) think he’s sweet. He’s also frustrating (and frustrated) because he doesn’t do his homework, doesn’t bother with the parts of the curriculum that don’t interest him, and still doesn’t remember to bring pencils, books etc. to class consistently. He just started junior high. That’s grade 7 around these parts, and he turned 12 after school started, which basically means that he is the youngest and smallest kid in the largest school in our area.

The second week of school, we had another one of these meetings: “Did he tell you about the incident on the playground?” (My heart was in my mouth.) “No. What happened?” “Well, he was telling stories, in that way he has.” “Yes?” “And first a few kids gathered, and then a few more, and then there were about 100 kids all in a circle, and we don’t want to draw too much attention, because you know those gatherings are how things get out of hand… so I dispersed the crowd and I asked him to try to keep it down…” “Was anything… happening?” I wanted some clarity, because I can see how a crowd of 14 and 15 year olds might be a bit of a problem. “No, but some of those kids were starting to hang around, and we don’t want him to attract their attention, because…” she tapered off. I didn’t say anything. “Well,” she said, “sometimes you just don’t want kids like him to be noticed.” I looked at The Dad. He looked at me. Still nothing. Finally The Dad said, “We’ll talk to him about it.” I guess we didn’t look sufficiently alarmed, or something, because she said, “It happened again today. First 5 kids, then 20, then 50… I got them to disperse [I'm pretty sure that's the word she used] and asked him to try not to get more than a few kids listening at once. It’s just… he doesn’t understand how those kids are. I told him I was just trying to help him, and he said to me, ‘I don’t need your help.’ ” The Dad and I looked at one another, each with one eyebrow raised. “We’ll talk to him.”

When we got back to the car, he said, “What do you think?” I said, “About the stories?” He nodded. “I think the school doesn’t know what to do with it.” Silence for a few seconds, and then I started to laugh, uncomfortably. “Um… your son. He’s… attracting a crowd. He’s telling stories and too many people want to listen, and we’ve never had that happen before, and we don’t know what to do with it, but it makes us nervous.”

I mean, I understand why it makes them nervous. As she said, crowds of 100? Fights tend to break out. Things get out of hand. But I couldn’t stop being amused by the idea of a storytelling “incident”. And then, underneath, I was unsettled. It’s basically the advice that we’ve been given all along. Camouflage him. Help him to blend in better. Teach him to hide his weirdness. (They don’t put it that way, of course. It is cloaked in the language of social skills and coping mechanisms.) It is done with the best of intentions. It is the mark of the caring and wonderful teachers that he has had all along that he has had so much help with all those strategies. Now that I think about it, it has been effective; I even find myself questioning my claim in the earlier paragraph about him not being particularly socially ept. He’s become pretty astute about what is going on in social situations, articulate about his emotions, and capable both of feeling deeply and recovering to a more even keel quickly. He’s more emotionally capable than most adults I know.

But when I look at the advice we’ve been offered, which we have passed along to him, I have to ask: Is this really the solution to bullying? Pretend that the really weird can become invisible, and thereby escape punishment? Or (if they are successful) simply shift it onto somebody else?

Don’t get me wrong; I’d rather that he weren’t targeted. At no point have I ever said that I was willing to sacrifice him to a greater good, or refused the assistance that he’s needed to become the child who can gather a crowd of 100, or say to a teacher, “I don’t need your help.” I’m just not comfortable with the way it’s being talked about, as though we have to acknowledge that there’s nothing we can do about bullying, so we have to teach potential targets to keep their heads down.

After this many years of being The Mom, when I sent him off to junior high school, I sat down with him the day before school and said:

“K. Just to be clear. When I went to junior high. It. Sucked. And I just want you to know [this was part of a much longer conversation] that you don’t have to put up with that shit.” (His eyebrows went up astonishingly high at this point.) “I wish that I could promise that I could always keep you safe, but there are people in the world that I can’t control, and they will try to make you be the way the way they want you want to be. But I want you to know that no matter what, I got yer back. And [this is the part that I've been reluctant to share, because it is fairly far from the party line in most circles I run in] I want you to know: I’d rather get a call to come and pick you up because you punched somebody in the nose than because you were crying in the bathroom after being pushed around.”

He looked at me, wide-eyed. “That’s not what I expected you to say,” he said.

I looked at him. “It’s not what I expected me to say either, ” I said. Then we had a talk about the wisdom of using violence, and the fact that a lot of the kids in the school are bigger than me, and taekwondo, and what I meant when I said that, and all the things that a person who is committed to peace in the world might bring up after coming up with such a statement. And what it comes down to is this: I’m tired of telling him to play small and make himself invisible in the world in the hopes that it won’t beat him up. Because in my experience, a) it doesn’t work and b) it teaches him to play small and invisible, and that there is something wrong with him and c) it doesn’t work. At least, it didn’t work for me. What shrinking to avoid attention taught me was to be ashamed of my intelligence, my abilities, my voice, my body… everything that made me ME. It also left me open to being pushed around on the bus, humiliated, shunned, made fun of, and to remaining silent about the whole thing.  It also left me open to being pushed around on the bus, humiliated, shunned, made fun of, and to remaining silent about the whole thing. I got quieter, and smaller, took up less space, apologized for my ideas (even in grad school and business meetings) and had major plastic surgery to make myself less visible to the world around me. I learned to wear grey, and beige, and baggy clothes, and to hold my tongue around strangers. (I never got good at that.) I learned to be a bystander instead of a target. Most of the time.

This is not the message I want to communicate to the next generation.

So he stood up tall his first day of junior high, and I worried, and he got home, and I said, “How was that?” and he said, “Pretty good, actually.” And so it went. And then, the storytelling incident, and then the conference, and then we came home, and we made good on our agreement with the teacher, and we talked about it with him. And it went like this: (For the purposes of this, PU = parental unit)

PU: So, tell me about these stories you’ve been telling at lunch time.

Him: Oh, I’ve been reciting The Hobbit.

PU: Reciting? From memory?

Him: Well, I have the book as a cue. But, yeah. Mostly.

PU: And what’s up with the crowds?

Him: Well, I was reading from The Hobbit, and then the kids wanted to listen to it, and you know, I’ve got these fans.

PU: Fans?

Him: Yeah. And they’re really good. They take care of the hecklers.

PU: Hecklers?

Him: Yeah, you know. If anybody comes and heckles me, I just close the book, and then they give them this look (demonstrated The Glare.)

PU: Does that work?

Him: Yeah, mostly.

So I wandered away, still not quite sure what to do. The next day, he said, “I got, like, 15 high fives at lunch time. Then this other kid came onto the bus and said, ‘You’re cool! You’re my favourite grade 7!’ and then sat down with me on the bus.” And I blinked. Walk in and own the school? Never thought of THAT strategy.

At this point in the story, I feel compelled to draw some general observations better left to another day. I am still trying to make sense of this, and still checking in with the child in question. It seems to be working. And no, I didn’t suggest that he stop telling stories on the playground.

Thinking about Thinking

When this picture was taken, I was actually thinking about trees. Photo credit: D.J. King, (who does some wonderful portraits and lives in Calgary, if you happen to need such a thing.)

You might not be surprised to hear that I’m big on metacognition. It’s one of my things. It might actually be my thing.

I have struggled with this, because in the academic world I was brought up in, one does not become an expert in process, one becomes an expert in object. The topics in most courses are existing thoughts and models of the world, not where those came from or what to do with them. When we write papers, we are expected to summarize the results of our thought processes, not to expose the thought processes themselves. (This mistake tends to lead to such comments on undergrad papers as, “rambling and incoherent.” This may be true. It might alternatively be, “circuitous and experimental.” One is bad writing, the other art. Avant garde or confused? Sometimes only time will tell. Although usually? It’s just bad writing.)

When I was studying physics, I was interested in the experimental methods, not the outcomes of the experiment. I fear that I didn’t care about the crystal structures of halogenated methanes, although the idea that you could use particular methods on particular materials intrigued me. I liked preparing samples, running experiments, figuring out what experiment might work next… but the main body of the work was in analyzing the data, sitting in front of a computer doing the same thing again, and again, and again.

When I was studying education, I was interested in what claims could be made and how to support them. I like teaching. No, I love teaching. I live for the moment that the eyes light up! But I don’t just want to teach the things I already learned. I want to teach people how to learn. Why are doing this? What’s the point?

When I was working with faculty members to develop their courses, I was interested in (and tasked with) the structure, not the content. I designed a course about designing courses. I’m all about the framework.

Until very, very recently, I have considered this a flaw. A failure in my character. An inability to commit to one line of investigation and see it thought to its conclusion. Occasionally, I have despaired. OK. Frequently, I have despaired. I am a generalist, I have said, in a world that rewards specialization. But it’s not quite true. I have been telling myself a false story, one which is attached to a model of The University as The Place where thinkers go. If I can’t find a place there, I can’t be a thinker. More recently, The Media has supplanted The University. If only I could get something published, if only somebody in a place of judgement would deem my thoughts, my writing, my self worthy, my existence would be justified. It would be OK to be a generalist. I would have value in the world.

So here’s a different story for me to consider: I am an expert in metacognition. What have I done for 10,000 hours? I have investigated my own thought processes, the nature of thought, the support of truth claims, the structure of disciplinary knowledge, the construction of coherent models, and the ways in which teachers and students communicate their models to one another. I have constructed and torn down so many possible ways of knowing inside my own head that it’s a constant renovation project. I have thought deeply about thinking. I have been reluctant to make these claims, because they are the landscape of the philosopher, the professor, the specialist in the discipline. I tend to believe that I’m not entitled to form a critique of something until I have succeeded at it, and my strongest critique is of the structures in the education system, particularly the post-secondary education system. And then I think, “Well, maybe I’m just bitter?” I ponder, construct, deconstruct, consider, philosophize… and come back again and again and again to, “People are going to say that I’m just bitter because I couldn’t make it as an academic.”

I still love the university! It has libraries, and theatres, and people to talk to, and frankly, it pays the bills. (“Many of my dearest friends are professors,” she protested feebly.) But honestly? There’s some truth there. I’m a little bitter. I’m a little frustrated that I have never found my path, that I’ve never had a full time permanent job, that I have become an expert in something that everybody says is so valued in our society, but that I can’t seem to find a way of turning it into gainful employment other than by trimming off the majority of the skill and finding a market for the portion that is left. I happen to think that it is wasteful to have me working at a job that only requires a high school diploma. I find myself apologizing for my education, which is both too much and inadequate, depending on where I stand.

Well, no more, I say! I’m thinking about thinking, and I’m proud! My next two posts are going to be titled, “I see your Levinas and raise you a Wittgenstein” (which is about internet comments and the limits of knowledge. I promise it requires no knowledge of either Levinas or Wittgenstein.) and “Why are we here, anyway?” (which is, tangentially, also about internet comments). There will also be, as time goes on, “Writing about Writing”.

All of which is an elaborate precursor to saying that I’m back, and that I’m in transition to taking my own writing seriously as a tool of engagement with the world. I’m willing to be subjective because I’m a subject! I have a position. And part of my position is that we generalists need to find a different way of being in the world, one that doesn’t require us to leave behind, immerse, drown, or amputate parts of our selves. When we judge ourselves by the same standards by which we are judged, those of the specialist and the expert, of course we are found wanting. We can’t change that part of the world, but we don’t have to subject ourselves to it. (See what I did there? Subject/subject. Noun/verb. Actor/acted upon? Oooh! I love when words do that.)

And then we need to find new ways of making a living. Because waiting for the path to appear? That way madness lies.

(I know. I’ve thought about it.)

On the Road: Learning to Play

Welcome to the September Carnival of Natural Parenting: Parenting Through Play

This post was written for inclusion in the monthly Carnival of Natural Parenting hosted by Hobo Mama and Code Name: Mama. This month our participants have shared how challenging discipline situations can be met with play. Please read to the end to find a list of links to the other carnival participants.

***

Hello, lovely carnival participants. As it happens, today is the day on which I finally head home on the last leg of my grand journey, so I will be in a car driving for many many hours. In case you don’t hear from me for a couple of days (likely), Welcome!

I don’t have much to say about discipline, or how to use play instead of consequences or any of those things. All I can tell you is that I just spent seven weeks in a car with two of my children, and it was grand. We stayed up until dark, played by lakes in the moonlight, ate marshmallows by campfires, lived on peanut butter sandwiches for days at a time, broke all the rules, and had a brilliant summer. It was the most fun I’ve had since I started this parenting journey almost exactly 12 years ago.

I’m a very earnest sort. I spend a lot most of my time trapped in my head. Playing is work for me. By that, I don’t mean that I equate work and play. I mean that to play… to stop teaching, and educating, and considering and pondering… to play requires enormous effort, thus defeating the point. If you point me at a game with clearly defined rules, I might be able to get into it. But for years I have gotten down on the floor with my children, trying to figure out what this playing thing is about anyway… knowing, as I do, that play is the essential thing that allows learning. Free play. Nature of the prolonged childhood of the human animal. Developmental necessity thereof. (I assume that there will be plenty of posts about the benefits of play. Please do read them. I’m sure I will.) But I find myself down there, on the floor, and I notice how messy the room is, and I think, “I’ll just pick up a few of these things then.” And the kids tell me I’m doing it wrong, and I get upset because I can’t figure out the rules, and they won’t accept any of my offers, and they tell me, “No, you have to be the giraffe, and she’s coming to rescue the zebra from the lions.” And I say something, and they say, “No, that’s not the voice the giraffe would use.” And then the giraffe gets grumpy, and the mama wanders away, feeling like a complete fraud: Bad mother who can’t play with her own kids.

It was all different this summer. I think it started on the second night of the “real” (camping) trip, after we had left my parents’ house. We set up the tent, and it was dusk, and the kids asked to go swimming. First I said, “No, but we can play on the beach.” And then I said we could play in the water. And then I said we could go in, but I planned on just wading and watching them from the edge. And then, when we had put on our bathing suits, and the water was spectacularly warm, and the light was beautiful, and everybody else was having such a good time, I dove in. We got our hair wet even though we were about to go to bed. We splashed about and swam and dived until the mosquitoes chased us away. We laughed at the fireflies in the fairy grove between the beach and the car. And something changed in my heart, I think. I wasn’t just taking my children on this trip. I was going with them.

We declared our digs palatial (on account of the air mattresses).

We took time to smell the roses:

And look at frogs and snakes and sunsets:

We climbed trees:

And danced in the spray from giant waterfalls:

We checked out playgrounds in many, many provinces.

New Brunswick:

Manitoba:

Alberta:

British Columbia:

We climbed things, and hiked places, and found many many many bugs. Did you know that the larvae of the caddis fly hide in sticks like hermit crabs do in shells? I didn’t either, until my son handed me one. (I didn’t believe him until he made me wait for it to come out and start swimming in the puddle in my hand.)

And somewhere along the line, among all the explorations and mysteries, I found this woman inside me:

Which is the best argument I can come up with.

(Thanks to my friend Dave, who took this picture in Cathedral Grove, MacMillan Provincial Park. Did I mention the trees?)

***

Carnival of Natural Parenting -- Hobo Mama and Code Name: MamaVisit Hobo Mama and Code Name: Mama to find out how you can participate in the next Carnival of Natural Parenting!

Please take time to read the submissions by the other carnival participants:

(This list will be live and updated by afternoon September 13 with all the carnival links.)

Just The Highlights, Ma’am

My daughter assures me that this was the best part of the trip across Canada:

They got to pet a flying squirrel at Science North

They also got to pet a skunk. She had no scent glands.

She was also impressed with the ground squirrels, Richardson and otherwise:

To sum up, the best thing about Canada is apparently the abundance of small furry animals. She also was highly focused on playgrounds and opportunities for swimming.

These were the best parts according to my son. (Each of these is getting it’s own page/post/chapter as I work through the writing of the trip.)

1. Mountains!

2. Royal Tyrell Museum

3. Sheep farming in Saskatchewan

I liked being outdoors for weeks on end, much to my surprise.

Glacier National Park

I’m not entirely sure which glacier this is, but we were hiking from the Illecillewaet campground. I claim in my notes that it is Walsh Glacier, and was named after some of the original explorers of the area, but I got that from the guide’s discussion while I was taking the picture, so I may have the details a little mixed up. It was, however, quiet and isolated. the river was glacial melt-water and too cold to touch, too fast to swim or canoe in, but beautiful to sit beside and listen to. There was a sing-along campfire the first night and a guided hike the next afternoon. I would go here for a whole week to rest and hike.

We went kayaking in Clayoquot sound, and I spent the next two days weeks trying to figure out how to move to Tofino.

My third pick is The Trees. Oh, the trees! (This photo is also from the trip to Tofino. Sorry about the light quality. I’m thinking a better camera might be a good idea.)

Some of these were 1000 years old

And the stuffies liked the top of Tunnel Mountain. Here they are having a good look at Banff:

Lily, Emily, and Hedwig rest after their long hike.

Banff:

What the stuffies were looking at

But what about Niagara Falls? Lake Superior? Kicking Horse Pass? Assiniboine Park in Winnipeg? The free performance of the Royal Winnipeg Ballet? I think I’m going to have to keep working on this.

Hey, did you know that Canada is really big?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 271 other followers