Poem: Hidden Knowledge

Hidden Knowledge

In a clearing in the woods
On a cliff overlooking the ocean
In a cave in the mountains
Someone waits.

She has the answer you seek,
In the hut,
In the cottage,
In the cave

You would not notice her
If you passed her in the street.
She has mastered the art of
Blending In,
Along with a dozen other Wisdoms,
Both ancient and modern.

But if you seek her earnestly,
Let down your guard enough
to see through her drab glamour,
you will find her.

There, in her cottage, she will say,
Shuffling toward you
With the already-brewed pot,
“Yes, yes. I’ve been expecting you.
I have just the thing, over here.
Somewhere.
Give me a minute.”

She will tell you a Story as she
riffles through the books,
rambling, murmuring.
“No. Not quite the one.
Oh… I remember this… (staring off into the distance)
Ah, yes. Here it is.” (Tap, tap, tap…)

Listen to the story. You will need it
Later.

Dancing into the Future

I don’t know what comes next.

I mean, I really have no idea what I’m going to do. There will be things that I’ve started (raising kids, building the greenhouse, making the beer) that need finishing. (And by “finishing,” I mean, “continued commitment over a period of days-to-months-to-years-to-TheRestOfMyLife without which all previous effort is wasted”)  But when people ask me, “What do you do?”

I just don’t know.

I don’t believe that I can slap on a bunch of identities and pretend that somehow I’ve answered the question, although that is the convenient (and accepted) way of doing things. “Tell me which boxes you fit in, and then I’ll know what to talk to you about.” I tried that. It sucked.

Yet I’ve spent the last several months trying to answer this question, because I am assured that without a valid answer, I will never Make Anything Of Myself. That is to say, I may continue to be somebody’s wife and mother, but nobody will ever pay me for any of the things I already know how to do if I can’t package them up into a nice neat package. With a job title. Or a snappy statement of problem and solution. (I help people who something something… by doing something something… and then their lives are spectacular and they become millionaires! Of course, if I knew how to do that, I would have done it by now. Because sure, money won’t buy happiness… but it would buy me a trip to the Caribbean, and that might be fun. Or solar panels, and that would be cool!) And (They say) if I can’t answer this question, nobody will ever pay me to do anything more interesting than move objects around and occasionally hand them to other people ever again. No pressure.

What I do: I Think. A Lot. I slide from one worldview to another the way that most people change their clothes. I insist that this is a good thing. I refuse, steadfastly, to take a stand without adequate evidence. Sometimes I believe in god, sometimes I believe in gods, and occasionally I even believe in G*d. (But not very often.) And sometimes I don’t. I have moments of complete nihilism, although they are becoming fewer and farther between, being replaced with the ground of a firm agnosticism and meditation practice.  Sometimes I am absolutely convinced that I’ve got it figured out, and that I’ve got something that is worth teaching… which is, I think, how to be comfortable in your life even when you aren’t sure of anything. See how that’s a hard thing to pin down? Slippery, that. Dancing your way through The World As it Is. Even when you don’t know how that world is.

This is the essence of Practice – to hear the music and let it move you. To find your core strength so that you can dance with abandon. To bring yourself into balance again, and again, and again, whether your house is tidy or not, whether your clothes reflect your inner self or not, whether you perceive your body to be what everybody else (the mythic They) wants it to be… or not. Whether you have managed to meet even one of the targets on this month’s women’s magazines, or business magazines, or any of the other ways our society finds to remind you, “Oh, yeah. You suck!” To find joy in embodied consciousness, even when you are waking up with existential angst at 3 in the morning. Perfection in imperfection. Spectacular mediocrity. How to have the best-damn-average life out there and revel in it!

There have been times in my life when I Knew. I always turned out to be wrong. Now, I don’t know… but I have a vague feeling that I might be right for a change.

After Loch Ness

I read a short story this week about an utterly conventional and dull fellow who found himself hiking in the “wilds of Scotland” (his complaint, having been forced to go for a walk by his new wife while on their winter honeymoon). At the end of the story, while watching the sun set, they see the Loch Ness monster. And I thought, “Oh, you poor sod. What the hell are you gonna do with that?”

I came home and told my husband about my reaction, and he asked, “And when did you see the Loch Ness Monster?” I thought of all the times that (as Camus puts it in The Myth of Sisyphus) the set has fallen away, and the absurdity of our lives became apparent. I thought about the night I stayed at the Buddhist Abbey, and the prayer wheel fell off the shelf above me in the middle of the night, causing me to sit straight up in bed with the words, “Wake Up!” at the top of my mind. I thought about the first time that my strict logical positivist viewpoint was challenged, when dealing with constructivism during my B.Ed. (“But!” said I, “What I teach has right and wrong answers!”) I thought about my first encounters with postmodernism, non-violent communication, pagans and meditation, about the day that I finally realized that my physical yoga process mirrored my mind-states, about coming to”know” that knowledge is provisional, and subjective, and mediated by our experiences… when I found out that I don’t really know what I mean when I say, “I love you“…

And I said, “All the time.”

The problem is, after you see Nessie, you come home, and everything is still the same. Chopping wood, carrying water, mending shirts, cooking supper. And it doesn’t take long before you start to doubt.

That moment, it felt different. I felt different. But then I came back, and everything else was still the same.

What is worse, you can’t tell people. And since nobody else can tell people either, Nessie remains unspeakable.

I was raised and trained to be a rational materialist. I was told (and accepted) that the world is strictly what can be measured and described scientifically. I “should” (I suppose) be a devotee of Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens. I find myself embarrassed by the subtleties of the world that I have experienced. I find myself waking up in the night thinking, “How could you tell if consciousness precedes form or form precedes consciousness? If consciousness were an emergent phenomenon, what would that imply to the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics? Is the world as it is expressive of some deeper pattern, or is it purely a result of random processes? How could you tell the difference??? And how in the name of god(s) can anybody stand living with me? ” (Since I have started turning on the light to write these things down, this last question is becoming a pressing concern.)

And then I get up, and I need to make sure that the kids have skates for the school trip, lunch money, pants that fit, and supper. Chopping wood, carrying water, musing about the nature of reality. And knowing this, if nothing else… there are things that, once you learn them, change everything. Even though they change nothing.


For the record, I don’t believe in the Loch Ness Monster. But I’m willing to be disproved.

We Are the Story Keepers

We are the story keepers.

When I talk about story, I refer to the lines of meaning, the patterns of the universe that are perpetuated by the telling and retelling. As the conscious manifestations of the local area, we are the intentional tellers of stories. But we get it backwards, because we forget that we are the story keepers, and the stories begin to tell us.

From Thomas King, I learned The Truth About Stories, when he told me (and the rest of Canada) in his Massey lectures, “The Truth About Stories is, that’s all we are.” As you unlayer yourself, you are a sequence of identities, each one of which contains narrative and story. You are a mother, and that comes with expectations. You are a daughter, you are a son, you are a straight, or queer, or questioning person, an accountant, a doctor, or an artist. Each of these identities that you might seize upon has language attached to it. We don’t get to use language without all that language implies.

Because the truth about stories is…

…that they tell us. And then we become trapped, and enmeshed in the stories that we were trying to tell. That we started out as the keeper of the story, and the story becomes the keeper of us. That one of the things that we were trying to do was find out what it means to be a mother, a daughter, a straight person, a queer person… What does it mean to be this kind of manifestation in the world? Stories are supposed to be tools that we carry down: These are the ways that other people have tried and investigated, and found out, “This might work.” And we mistake ourselves deeply when we hold those stories so tightly to ourselves that we forget that we are telling the story and the story is not telling us.

From my queer theory, Race, Culture, and Schooling professor, Dan Yon, I learned to pay attention to my reading practices. This means that when I catch the story telling me how to respond to something I read, I am to step outside that story, step outside that identity, and engage with the story I am currently being told, rather than responding from the position of the story I already assume to be true.

From the Buddhists, I learned to doubt my stories, to recognize that the voice in my head that says, “You will never be anything, you will never amount to anything, no one wants to hear what you have to say,” is Not Me. It is not True. The story, “You’re brilliant and fabulous and wonderful and everybody will throw showers of riches upon you,” is also Not Me. And not True.

The only thing that is true is stepping forward, and stepping forward, and stepping forward again. Breathe in. Breathe out.

A long time ago, I mentioned the tragedy of human consciousness, the thought arrived at while staring at my cat and reading Schopenhauer. Somehow I came up with a funny story about reading Schopenhauer, but I diverted from my initial aim. Allow me now to come back to it. Because here is what I see as the tragedy of human consciousness:

We can imagine the future, but we cannot predict it.

We spend our entire lives trying to convince ourselves that other than that is true. That if only we could find the right story, the right line, everything will become clear, our future will be laid out in front of us, and all of our uncertainties and terrors will be washed away. This becomes tragedy because we are so caught up in our own terror that we have to impose our false certainty on the world, and people, and the animals and plants around us. We stop being the story keepers and become the story told. We become enmeshed in the story. Enmeshed, not in trying to find out whether the story is true, but in trying to prove that the story is true, because that would alleviate our discomfort, and our fear, and postpone our recognition that we don’t know the future.

More tragic is that because we can imagine the future, we hold people responsible for failing to imagine the future that comes upon them. There are predictable outcomes, but they are not determined by our actions. And we are very hard upon people in the process of trying to deny that. We are very hard on ourselves. (But that is a post for another day.)

In my super-secret other life (1) I am bringing to the world a story about uncertainty, about releasing the story lines that you are holding, about learning to dance from one story to another. About uncrystallizing the mental constructions of the world you see outside you, and recognizing that while you can work to some extent on imagining and modeling, you cannot KNOW what comes what comes next.

Let us start with the dinner table, for its immediacy. You cannot KNOW in that moment what the person across from you is thinking, what the person across from you will do next. You have an imaginary version of your partner (or your child, or your parent) in your head. And when your imaginary partner doesn’t line up with the real one in the world in front of you, you need to learn that the one in front of you is real. We start with our partners, and our intimate relationships, and our children, and the people closest to us because we get to practice with them daily. But once we realize that the people we love best, we don’t really know, and we don’t have a complete structure of them in our heads, we start to learn humility, and from that we can go on to realize that the people who we encounter on a daily basis who are not our intimate partners, we really know almost nothing about. We have profoundly poor models of the complete stranger.

My work at the moment (and I have a nagging suspicion that this is My Work in all the sense that that implies) is to draw people towards the sense that the stories are possible truths, but they are not Truth. That considering, rather than believing is the path to freeing yourself from being kept by the stories, and to returning to the role of the consciousness as the story keeper. When we talk about the egoic mind, one of the ways that I describe it is that we have come to believe the stories, rather than telling them… and as we who have tried know, to escape the egoic mind, and stop believing the stories is incredibly challenging. But it is the start of Practice.


1. The one in my head and on paper, and eventually website with e-books and courses and the like but you can’t have the URL yet, because it is a garden full of tiny seedlings, but that’s why I haven’t been blogging so much recently but I’ll still keep this one because it’s kind of like my house now, and I like having all of you round for dinner and everything…

Entering the Fallow Time

It is a blustery day in Cape Breton. The river is dark and capped with waves, the sky is dark and a not-quite uniform grey. The leaves are starting to turn, and we are down to the final few days in the garden, in a race to get the greenhouse covered before it is Too Late. I think I’ve figured out how to attach the ends. Please cross your fingers that I have figured out how to attach the ends. There will be weeping if this one falls down or blows away.

There is a nigh-enforced period of reduced activity in a climate as “temperate” as the one I live in. The inflow of energy is obviously cyclical when you find yourself north of 45. All too soon after the days of swimming and picnics, autumn arrives. The sunlight dims and the temperature falls. It is a matter of weeks before we can anticipate being snowed in, at least for a day or two at a time. We know: it is the time of stews, and blankets, and long sleeves and dark clothes.

I slow down at this time of year, and I just keep getting slower until the end of February or so. I need more sleep, I have difficulty getting going, and I want to stay home a lot.

This is not what our culture allows.

September ramped up my activity level to a point that I started waking up at 4 in the morning. Exhausted, but awake. Mind racing, schedule ruling my life, demands of the schools running through my mind. Gym shoes, school fees, swimming classes, registrations, and the like, overlapping drop-offs and pick ups at times outside of my control and at locations separated by tens of kilometers. Oddly enough, I started having anxiety problems. I cut down on my caffeine, increased my intake of EFA’s, started taking a B-vitamin, made myself go to bed at 10 every night, added meditation and yoga to my calendar on a (nearly) daily basis. (I’m feeling a lot better, actually.)

But why? Why do we do this to ourselves every fall? Just as our bodies are settling into the swamp of lethargy for a nice long stay? Where is the honour for the natural rhythms?

So, over there somewhere, I’m working on a new business. But I won’t be planning a product launch in November. That is a recipe for burning out. It is the time of winter wheat and over-wintered crops. We will lay in the last of the harvest, and bring in the firewood. We will finish planting the garlic. And then we will scale back to the necessary. I will write, and ponder, and consider. And play with my babies, and make bread, and hang out next to the woodstove, and do yin yoga. It is the time for deep rest. Our bodies know.

I know.

Thinking about Thinking

When this picture was taken, I was actually thinking about trees. Photo credit: D.J. King, (who does some wonderful portraits and lives in Calgary, if you happen to need such a thing.)

You might not be surprised to hear that I’m big on metacognition. It’s one of my things. It might actually be my thing.

I have struggled with this, because in the academic world I was brought up in, one does not become an expert in process, one becomes an expert in object. The topics in most courses are existing thoughts and models of the world, not where those came from or what to do with them. When we write papers, we are expected to summarize the results of our thought processes, not to expose the thought processes themselves. (This mistake tends to lead to such comments on undergrad papers as, “rambling and incoherent.” This may be true. It might alternatively be, “circuitous and experimental.” One is bad writing, the other art. Avant garde or confused? Sometimes only time will tell. Although usually? It’s just bad writing.)

When I was studying physics, I was interested in the experimental methods, not the outcomes of the experiment. I fear that I didn’t care about the crystal structures of halogenated methanes, although the idea that you could use particular methods on particular materials intrigued me. I liked preparing samples, running experiments, figuring out what experiment might work next… but the main body of the work was in analyzing the data, sitting in front of a computer doing the same thing again, and again, and again.

When I was studying education, I was interested in what claims could be made and how to support them. I like teaching. No, I love teaching. I live for the moment that the eyes light up! But I don’t just want to teach the things I already learned. I want to teach people how to learn. Why are doing this? What’s the point?

When I was working with faculty members to develop their courses, I was interested in (and tasked with) the structure, not the content. I designed a course about designing courses. I’m all about the framework.

Until very, very recently, I have considered this a flaw. A failure in my character. An inability to commit to one line of investigation and see it thought to its conclusion. Occasionally, I have despaired. OK. Frequently, I have despaired. I am a generalist, I have said, in a world that rewards specialization. But it’s not quite true. I have been telling myself a false story, one which is attached to a model of The University as The Place where thinkers go. If I can’t find a place there, I can’t be a thinker. More recently, The Media has supplanted The University. If only I could get something published, if only somebody in a place of judgement would deem my thoughts, my writing, my self worthy, my existence would be justified. It would be OK to be a generalist. I would have value in the world.

So here’s a different story for me to consider: I am an expert in metacognition. What have I done for 10,000 hours? I have investigated my own thought processes, the nature of thought, the support of truth claims, the structure of disciplinary knowledge, the construction of coherent models, and the ways in which teachers and students communicate their models to one another. I have constructed and torn down so many possible ways of knowing inside my own head that it’s a constant renovation project. I have thought deeply about thinking. I have been reluctant to make these claims, because they are the landscape of the philosopher, the professor, the specialist in the discipline. I tend to believe that I’m not entitled to form a critique of something until I have succeeded at it, and my strongest critique is of the structures in the education system, particularly the post-secondary education system. And then I think, “Well, maybe I’m just bitter?” I ponder, construct, deconstruct, consider, philosophize… and come back again and again and again to, “People are going to say that I’m just bitter because I couldn’t make it as an academic.”

I still love the university! It has libraries, and theatres, and people to talk to, and frankly, it pays the bills. (“Many of my dearest friends are professors,” she protested feebly.) But honestly? There’s some truth there. I’m a little bitter. I’m a little frustrated that I have never found my path, that I’ve never had a full time permanent job, that I have become an expert in something that everybody says is so valued in our society, but that I can’t seem to find a way of turning it into gainful employment other than by trimming off the majority of the skill and finding a market for the portion that is left. I happen to think that it is wasteful to have me working at a job that only requires a high school diploma. I find myself apologizing for my education, which is both too much and inadequate, depending on where I stand.

Well, no more, I say! I’m thinking about thinking, and I’m proud! My next two posts are going to be titled, “I see your Levinas and raise you a Wittgenstein” (which is about internet comments and the limits of knowledge. I promise it requires no knowledge of either Levinas or Wittgenstein.) and “Why are we here, anyway?” (which is, tangentially, also about internet comments). There will also be, as time goes on, “Writing about Writing”.

All of which is an elaborate precursor to saying that I’m back, and that I’m in transition to taking my own writing seriously as a tool of engagement with the world. I’m willing to be subjective because I’m a subject! I have a position. And part of my position is that we generalists need to find a different way of being in the world, one that doesn’t require us to leave behind, immerse, drown, or amputate parts of our selves. When we judge ourselves by the same standards by which we are judged, those of the specialist and the expert, of course we are found wanting. We can’t change that part of the world, but we don’t have to subject ourselves to it. (See what I did there? Subject/subject. Noun/verb. Actor/acted upon? Oooh! I love when words do that.)

And then we need to find new ways of making a living. Because waiting for the path to appear? That way madness lies.

(I know. I’ve thought about it.)

Trust30 – Your Personal Message

What is burning deep inside of you? If you could spread your personal message RIGHT NOW to 1 million people, what would you say?
Stop. Take a deep breath. Listen deep inside. All this frantic rushing about isn’t getting you anywhere. You don’t have to be “important” to matter.

You have a story to tell. A story that is yours and no other’s. Don’t spend your life being a bit player in somebody else’s story. More to the point, don’t let other people convince you that you are a bit player in their story. Spend your energy on your priorities and passions and loves. Be kind, be gentle, but be firm. “No, darling. This is my story. Please stop trying to recruit me into yours.”

You do not belong to your parents, or your employer, or your lover. Enter into agreements freely, play your part, but never allow the role to consume you. Too many are eaten by their roles, forget that they have a meaningful part to play and a story to tell that can’t be taken up by somebody else. That existential alarm? It’s real. Pay attention to it. But don’t let the ego get you, either. It’s a fine line… a dance, perhaps.

Someday you will go to your grave. And someday the world will be consumed in fire. You have This Moment to be honest. Be kind, be gentle, but be firm. Tell your story, because nobody else can.

The Story That Needs Telling

I signed up for the Trust30 writing prompts for the month of June. The first prompt was this:

We are afraid of truth, afraid of fortune, afraid of death, and afraid of each other. Our age yields no great and perfect persons. – Ralph Waldo Emerson

You just discovered you have fifteen minutes to live.

1. Set a timer for fifteen minutes.
2. Write the story that has to be written.

(Author: Gwen Bell)”

And so I wrote this (If it causes you concern for my mental health, please bear in mind that the month of May was probably the most out of balance I’ve been in several years.)

“I never managed to do what I was “supposed” to, but it seems I always managed to do what was needed… eventually. I think my biggest mistake was thinking that it was never enough, impressive enough. I wanted to be Virginia Woolf, or Maude Barlowe, or Vandana Shiva or… somebody. I wanted to feel like it mattered, that somehow I had turned up.

I’m sorry I spent my life trying to be somebody else. Seems that what mattered really were the moments, not the accomplishments. So I never wrote an article that was published in a major magazine, and I never managed to get something on the CBC. I guess my ideas are out there, somewhere, in dribs and drabs. Most people’s are.

I admit I am disappointed, though. I thought it would be different, this life thing. Turns out, maybe, maybe that what I needed was a lot more nothing in my life. Less striving, more sitting. Never got the hang of these schedule things – just another bit to fail at in my opinion. Best not to make plans, that way you won’t be disappointed. Also, in my experience, people always put too much into the schedule, not enough down time, not enough sitting, too much doing. The world needs more yoga, less driving.

Some of my best moments were the nothing ones. Snuggling on the couch, watching the clouds, not even reading a book, not even meditating. Just… nothing. Those were when I felt most truly like I got it. There weren’t enough of those.

Meditation, yoga, snuggling, sitting in the green, creating. All the rest was born of desperation to be seen, Ozymandias-like, I suppose.

Virginia Woolf ended badly, anyway. And I’m going out with a cat on my lap, wind in the trees, and chickens ’round the corner. Far better than a pocket full of rocks.”

And that’s when the timer went. So that is the story I would have left, had it all in fact come to a conclusion while I was sitting in my deck chair this morning.

Closets, Comma, Organizing Of

Of course, whenever I say that I have nothing to say on a subject, I immediately think of something to say. I’m like that. (I was going to add an “organizing” tag, but it made me laugh too hard. Let’s not go there, right?)

Regarding closets, organizing of (as opposed to closets, getting out of, which is the large post I’ve been working on since last week)… We have a completely different approach, and it made an enormous difference to the level of catastrophe in our house. Here’s my secret: we don’t use the closets. Instead, we turned over the smallest bedroom to the task of holding all the clothing and put all the dressers in there.

Blah, blah, blah... I know it looks like the "before" photo in a makeover show. You should have seen the real "before" photo.

No home decor here. Someday. Maybe. If a miracle occurs and the day sprouts 14 more hours.

As a result, everybody gets changed in the bathroom or the “dressing room”, all laundry goes straight into the sorting bins on top of the washer and dryer:

The laundry sorting facility. IKEA is our friend.

and all clean laundry goes right back into the dressing room (which happens to be right next to the washer and dryer). Sometimes the clean laundry becomes a pile the size of a baby elephant (in the words of a friend of mine), but it is a contained baby elephant.

No baby elephants here.

And it is not on my bed, which is a huge improvement over the old “solution”. On sunny days, the washer loads are diverted to the clothesline. Also, I like to fold while watching a movie, so some loads migrate to the living room, but the laundry chaos is almost controlled by this scheme. Even better, when it escapes, making a trail of laundry all the way down the hallway, it only takes a few minutes to reclaim the house. One moment of triumph! My housekeeping doesn’t completely suck!

Just don’t look at the kitchen, ‘k?


Bonus: Then we had to find something to do with the closets!

Beer! Wine! Storage for equipment!

The Mouths of Babes

It has been a strange week in the world of The Dilettante, and my writing has suffered as a result. On the other hand, I had a chance to reconnect with old friends, eat fabulous restaurant food, and revel in one of the great luxuries of our day, a weekend in the city. Upon returning home, though, I’ve been having trouble getting back into the routine of my normal days. I imagine that this, too, shall pass.

In lieu of the Very Long Post Regarding Closets, the getting out of (as opposed to closets, the organizing of, which is almost certain never to make it onto this blog), I give you a report on my last trip to town with the youngest, who shall hereafter in this story be referred to as, “Speaker of Truth”. Yesterday, I and the Speaker of Truth had been admiring the vehicles on display at the mall, and particularly coveting the electric-blue pickup truck. I was describing it to my partner, and said that I would add on a King Cab and an extended bed, thus making it a $70,000 truck. He whistled. I raised my eyebrows. The Speaker of Truth asked, “Do you have $70?” (He can’t quite put together numbers That Big.) I allowed as how, although I had $70, $70,000 was right out. And he, in his infinite wisdom said, bluntly… “Then you can’t have it.” And thus ended the discussion of the electric blue pickup truck.

On the way home, my daughter started talking about all the construction that we were going past, worrying about the number of trees that had been cut to build the houses, and provide the lots. Eventually she said, “When I grow up, me and my friends are going to save the earth.” And the Speaker of Truth said, “But what are you going to DO to save the earth?”

If only we kept a few four-year-olds in parliament, I think that things could go a lot better. But only, of course, if we listened to them.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 271 other followers